Consequences of German Appeasement

Merkel’s Germany has put its head in the mouth of the Russian bear. Germans may regret that.

The US Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system aims to stop missiles from North Korea and Iran reaching US targets.

North Korean missiles would follow a North Pacific trajectory, and to counter them GMD has interceptor sites in Ft. Greely, Alaska, and Vandenberg AFB, California.

Iran would launch over Europe and the North Atlantic, so the GMD needs bases there.

GMD is not a threat to Russia. It will launch over the pole, and has deployed new missiles to defeat GMD. They use quick burning solid-fuel boosters, making it hard for US satellites to spot launches, and a warhead that maneuvers, severely complicating GMD tracking.

Nevertheless the Russians are bitterly fighting to stop GMD deployment in Poland and the Czech Republic.

And now the Germans have weighed in on the Russian side (WSJ, $, my ellipsis):

…Vladimir Putin lashed out against the (US GMD) missile plan, knowing full well this limited system could never put a dent in Russia’s own nuclear threat.

Germany’s foreign minister immediately rushed to the defense — of the Kremlin. (The German Foreign Minister) accused the U.S. of supposedly failing to inform Russia about the missile plans.

Ms. Merkel could have set her foreign minister straight…But she, who grew up in East Germany, only seconded him. Ahead of a trip to Warsaw last week, the chancellor said, “We, and I will say it in Poland, prefer a solution within NATO and also an open discussion with Russia about it.”

Germany economic pressure on Poland and the Czech Republic – maybe with EU support – could succeed, limiting GMD to the UK. That means less defensive depth, exposing the East Coast cities.

But the biggest losers would be the German people. With an appeasing government, energy dependence on Russia, and NATO a dead letter, they face the embrace of the Russian bear.

And that – as they found in 1945 and after – is not a good place to be.

Advertisements

2 Responses to Consequences of German Appeasement

  1. Bill K. says:

    I am reminded of General Patton’s famous saying: “Fixed fortifications are monuments to the stupidity of man.” Any defense can eventually be circumvented. If you are faced with a threat the best strategy is to remove that threat thus ending it once and for all.

    In the case of the Iranian threat it means removing the missile launching sites, removing the nuclear sites and removing the mullahs.

  2. Bill K

    Right! Here’s a Churchill quote along the same lines:

    If you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves.

    We should fight now, while the victory will be sure but not too costly

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: