The conservative Brit blogosphere is oddly equivocal about reports that a fellow blogger faces arrest for objecting to Brit Muslims sexually enslaving kids.
I am currently out of the Country and on my return home to England I am going to be arrested by British detectives on suspicion of Stirring up Racial Hatred by displaying written material” contrary to sections 18(1) and 27(3) of the Public Order Act 1986.
The issue seems to be the blogger’s virulent objection in print to this situation described by the London Times:
Schoolgirls in Lancashire and Yorkshire are falling prey to sinister gangs of pimps. Two men have been sent to jail, but the girls’ mothers, not the police, are at the forefront of the crackdown. Why are the authorities so reluctant to get involved?
The Times describes the MO – young Pakistani men directed by older Pakistani males seek out and befriend young white girls without fathers. Then they rape the kids the day they turn 13 because:
If anyone has sex with a girl under 13, there is a strong risk of being arrested for having sex with a minor. Once they reach 13, however, unless the victim makes a complaint to the police, nothing will happen.
The local cops are covering this up:
Despite evidence from rigorous research by organisations…that the gangs are largely made up of men from the Pakistani Muslim communities, many are determined to downplay this….
In 2004, a controversial documentary on the topic of Asian pimps, Edge of the City, focused on the mothers of two girls being pimped by Pakistani gangs in Bradford, West Yorkshire.
…an assistant chief constable with Lancashire police, says he is aware that several recent cases reported to police in Lancashire have involved Asian men, but that the issue of sexual grooming of young girls is not based solely on race or culture.
Originally due to be screened in May 2004, three years after the Bradford race riots, the documentary was pulled from the schedule at the request of the West Yorkshire Police.
Sexual enslavement of little girls is as old as mankind. But it’s not an acceptable behavior to most Brit natives, and should not be airbrushed out by the cops they pay to enforce the law.
And it’s reasonable to assume that men from a religion that treats women as second-class will be more prone to pimping than Brits. Even Brown’s awful government has woken up to that (my sequencing):
Muslims have three times the unemployment rate of the general population, with more than half economically inactive…
In an attempt to stop young Muslims being seduced by Al-Qaeda, women will be sent on training courses designed for (large corporation) managers to give them the skills and confidence to confront fanatics.
Back to Lionheart, whose legal advisor say received this email (scroll down to comment on 5 Jan at 11:46):
“QUOTE FROM IAN HOLDEN, BEDFORDSHIRE POLICE
The offence that I need to arrest you for is “Stir up Racial Hatred by displaying written material” contrary to sections 18(1) and 27(3) of the Public Order Act 1986.
You will be arrested on SUSPICION of the offence. You would only be charged following a full investigation based on all the relevant facts and CPS consent.
Paul I will see you on the 19/02/08 when I will tell you everything that you need to know. Due to being out of the office for six weeks I will not have access to my email as of tomorrow 04/01/08.
Being arrested by Brit cops on suspicion is very nasty (see link above):
Just because it seems unlikely that the Attorney General would grant permission for a prosecution, does not mean that you will not be humiliated by being arrested, fingerprinted (ten fingers, both palms, if applicable), photographed, DNA sampled (all of which will be retained on the Police intelligence databases until your 100th birthday, or longer), and have your computers and mobile phones seized, and internet and phone communications traffic data logfiles etc. snooped through, even if no charges are ever brought against you…
The blogger might have made this up, but we’ve seen it before when Brit cops tried to suppress a documentary on Muslim hate speech in mosques, while giving the perps a free pass.
So how did Brit bloggers react? Here’s one I consider the soundest:
As it stands – from what we can make out – the man is not at this stage to be charged for any offence and the arrest is an “administrative” device which the police are using to secure a formal interview on the record….
At this stage, therefore, one can only counsel a watching brief. Lurid declamations seem hardly warranted, and nor is the general accusation that we are descending into a police state – those who have actually lived in a police state will readily attest to the difference.
That rather downplays the oppressive consequence of a groundless arrest which is indeed similar to, say, Nazi practice. And here’s another well respected Brit conservative blogger:
Now reading (Lionheart’s) post I don’t quite understand exactly what it is that he’s said. I’m also not sure that I’m likely to agree with what I suspect he did say: that one blog post tells me that he’s not really my kind of guy.
Indeed, Lionheart is a bit odd – he capitalizes his posts a lot – but that’s absolutely nothing to do with the merits of the case. Which is that, if what he and the London Times say are true, Brit cops are flying top cover for an immigrant group that sexually enslaves Brit kids.
That makes the pimps and the cops equally disgusting, and suggests the UK will fall quite quickly to Islam.
It follows from the above that the defense of Brit freedoms will fall to the likes of Lionheart, capitalization and all, while the respectable Brit conservatives keep their heads tucked in the sand.
That’s not surprising – last time round, it took the unpolished Oliver Cromwell to dump the Brit elite